Q Have the directors violated any of their DUTIES under Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Home, - Have the directors violated any of their DUTIES Question - Octagon Supplements is a company registered in Australia. It is a seller of organic health and nutrition supplements. The company's directors approve a resolution to invest the company's money in a new business venture. This resolution was approved only after the company hired a management consultant, someone who possessed expert knowledge of the health and nutrition supplement industry who researched and prepared a report on the viability of the new business venture. The expert advised the company that the new business venture would very likely be successful and make the company $5 million in the first year. Eight months after the company has made this investment, the company has lost money on it. The expert's revenue projections now look impossible. And in hindsight, it is now clear to the directors that investing in the new business venture was a bad idea. The shareholders now blame the directors for their decision. Have the directors violated any of their DUTIES under Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)? If so, which DUTY or DUTIES did they violate? Is there any DEFENCE available to the directors? If so, is this DEFENCE valid? Explain your answer citing specific sections of the Corporations Act. Answer - The octagon supplements company directors have not gone through the corporation act 2001, it is an act of commonwealth of Australia that gives the rules that relates the corporations of octagon. Some of the duties were followed through the octagon, duty like acting with the good faith through the best interests of the corporation and for the best purpose, duty to been act with the care and diligence, duty for avoiding the improper information usages, duty to avoid the use of position as improper way, duty to disclose some of the interests on the organization. Some defence were valid for the octagon supplements, directors concerns about the exposure of the lost money. The provision will not be able to reject the liability over the director, any kind of the breach of the director's duty of loyalty with the corporation over the stakeholder, this will omission the good faith which will have the some misunderstanding for the law of violation. After the money loss the government campaigns the notation for the needy for increasing the risk taking for which the company would grow. Some of the judgement was not good through proper policy, there was no proper interest over the subject making judgement which could inform the organization in means of the issues. The directors make the believe on judgement over the best interests for the corporation over the rational which would hold it for the mone loss. Related: How would the law of tort apply in this case Does he have to pay the full price in this case Will Jono likely be successful in his action in tort Explain to him his rights under contract law Have the directors violated any of their DUTIES
Related :- Q Explain to him his rights under contract law explain to him his rights under contract law - Charles wants to get a remedy against Pete's Motorcycle Dealership. Explain to him his rights under contract law Q Will Jono likely be successful in his action in tort will jono likely be successful in his action in tort - will jono likely be successful in his action in tort for deceit against miguel? explain your answer Q Does he have to pay the full price in this case does he have to pay the full price in this case - Would your answer be different if Karl already had his hair cut and shave before being informed by real cost Q How would the law of tort apply in this case how would the law of tort apply in this case - This was later proven to be caused by the defective manufacturing of the devices. How would the law of tort apply Q How can MNEs act ethically in host countries how can mnes act ethically in host countries - HI5016 - What are the pressures that encourage politicians in newly industrialising countries to allow MNEs. Q Apply the gravity model to India and China apply the gravity model to india and china - Why has it taken so long for India and China to become serious trading partners. Q How an export subsidy is theoretically meant to work how an export subsidy is theoretically meant to work - International Trade And Enterprise - Why industries do not generate overseas revenue and domestic profits Q Why these demonstrations were mostly directed at the IMF why these demonstrations were mostly directed at the imf - HI5016 - Why do some marginalised groups in the USA and Canada reject the idea of globalisation Q Define absolute advantage and comparative advantage define absolute advantage and comparative advantage - Explain why Japan exports automobiles, while the U.S. exports aircraft? Q Is her employer responsible for the broken elbow is her employer responsible for the broken elbow - Is her employer responsible for the broken elbow she suffered while in hospital