Q What is meant by the Doctrine of Precedent? When will the courts imply terms into a contract? Home, - What is meant by the Doctrine of Precedent Question 1 - What is meant by the Doctrine of Precedent? Answer - The doctrine of precedent can be regarded as a source of law where decisions made by other judges in a superior court will be followed by other courts. The doctrine of precedent facilitates that a judge can refer to a ruling made by another judge in a superior court can make a decision on a ruling based on what he or she has observed in the other ruling. The judge/magistrate is entitled to making his or her decision on a ruling the other rulings made by the other judge only provides him or her with the facts. The provision of facts to the judge or magistrate makes the doctrine of precedent to lie under the source of law. Law is defined as a set of rules developed over a period of time where this rules regulates the people. With the doctrine of precedent allowing judges/magistrates to make decisions based on the facts collected from previous rulings this makes it to be regarded as a law as the decisions made are from rules which have been developed over time and have been referred to by other judges/magistrates to make decisions. Question 2 - When will the courts imply terms into a contract? Answer - Implied terms can be regarded as provisions or terms that a court assumes they were included in a contract. Implied terms are provided for byusage/custom, common law, statute or prior dealings where terms of a certain activity are being referred to. Regarding custom/usage on implied terms, these are terms that are widely known in a certain activity. For instance when one receives services from a barber one is expected to pay. Regarding common law, a court imply terms by referring to a common law, for instance in arbitration the agreement made is classified. Regarding previous dealings, a court imply terms by using the terms a business/firm has been using in the previous transactions/dealings. Regarding statute, a court can imply terms by referring to statute that is the laws passed by the parliament. For instance a court can refer to the consumer law where a supplier should supply goods of acceptable quality to the consumer. Related: What is meant by the Doctrine of Precedent Can Rebecca claim unpaid stipend under contract law What is Lion Tree liability What is an injunction What methods can Ross attempt
Related :- Q What is BCGs portfolio growth matrix what is bcgs portfolio growth matrix - HC3141 - Explain with the help of a diagram and choose any one Mobile phone/technology company which can use this model Q Explain Porters generic strategies explain porters generic strategies - HC3141 - You have studied Porters three generic strategies. Explain all three strategies in detail and provide an example. Q Explain Ansoff Matrix model explain ansoff matrix model - HC3141 International Strategic Management - Use this model to discuss the strategies for one company. Q What do you understand by diversification what do you understand by diversification as a growth strategy - HC3141 International Strategic Management - Explain the two types of diversification. Q Discuss marginal product of labour discuss marginal product of labour - International Trade And Enterprise - How has that migration of labour been of advantage to other countries. Q Have the directors violated any of their DUTIES have the directors violated any of their duties - Have the directors violated any of their DUTIES under Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Q Explain to him his rights under contract law explain to him his rights under contract law - Charles wants to get a remedy against Pete's Motorcycle Dealership. Explain to him his rights under contract law Q Will Jono likely be successful in his action in tort will jono likely be successful in his action in tort - will jono likely be successful in his action in tort for deceit against miguel? explain your answer Q Does he have to pay the full price in this case does he have to pay the full price in this case - Would your answer be different if Karl already had his hair cut and shave before being informed by real cost Q How would the law of tort apply in this case how would the law of tort apply in this case - This was later proven to be caused by the defective manufacturing of the devices. How would the law of tort apply